Church Partnership and Recommendation Policy

Our goal is to serve the body of Christ with faithfulness, charity, and clarity—pointing people toward churches that proclaim the Gospel and uphold the essentials of the faith, while recognizing legitimate secondary differences among orthodox believers (; ).

This policy governs (1) which churches we publicly commend or list as encouraged/recommended, and (2) which churches or ministries we will partner with for co‑branded integrations or API usage under Calvinist Parrot Ministries.

Foundations

We do not compromise the core doctrines outlined in our Doctrinal Statement. Churches may differ on secondary matters (baptism mode/subjects, governance forms, spiritual gifts, worship style, aspects of covenant theology) without forfeiting Gospel fellowship. We pursue unity in essentials, liberty in non‑essentials, and charity in all things (; ).

Endorsement Categories (Church Finder)

We do not infer doctrine beyond what is explicitly published online. Absence of content is treated as unknown, not denial.

Partnership Criteria (API / Ministry Collaboration)

We may partner with, list, or integrate churches/ministries that:

  1. Affirm all core doctrines (Trinity; deity and humanity of Christ; authority of Scripture; incarnation and virgin birth; atoning work of Christ; historical death, burial, resurrection; justification by grace through faith in Christ alone; return and final judgment; character of God).
  2. Do not deny any essential doctrine either explicitly or structurally.
  3. Are free of disqualifying critical concerns (below).
  4. Demonstrate a published commitment to preaching or teaching the Word of God ().
  5. Conduct public worship and ministry practices in ways consistent with basic biblical order and clarity ().

We may still list a church with Limited Information while declining partnership until clarity is established. Partnerships are revocable if later evidence contradicts published claims.

Disqualifying Critical Concerns (Red Flags)

Presence of any of these with clear, published evidence results in “Not Endorsed” status and disqualifies partnership. Scriptural citations illustrate doctrinal boundaries.

Evidence must come from official church publications (statement of faith, sermon summaries, leadership pages, doctrinal pages). We do not treat isolated ambiguous phrasing as conclusive without context.

Information Gaps

When a church lacks a published statement of faith, confession, or doctrinal detail, we categorize rather than speculate. Informational badges (for example, “No Statement of Faith”, “Minimal Doctrinal Detail”) distinguish absence of clarity from doctrinal error. These alone do not disqualify partnership; due diligence continues until clarification is obtained.

Correction and Appeals

If you believe an assessment is inaccurate, please email with:

We review updates promptly. If disqualifying content is removed and sound doctrine is affirmed, status/partnership may be reconsidered (; ).

Summary

We champion Gospel faithfulness across orthodox traditions while exercising discernment where doctrine is distorted or unclear. Our aim is not punitive, but protective, pastoral, and principled. Soli Deo Gloria ().